Hallperian and Wallace disprove their own evidence

[Danielle Loves Kurt]

I found this and it's comments taken from NBC Dateline about the murder of Kurt and it disproves evidence right from Hallperian and Wallaces mouths. Wallace was quoted as saying, "We spent eight years looking for a smoking gun, and nothing proves Courtney Love killed Kurt Cobain. We searched, and we searched hard."


They also agreed that it is possible for prints to be smudged off a gun when it recoils on firing. The three other medical examiners told "Dateline" that the information provided was found to be "inconclusive". Handwriting analysts that were showed the suicide note said the sample was inconclusive, and may have been similar to samples of Cobain's handwriting. Halperin and Wallace's conclusions; claiming they interviewed five medical examiners, two of which said that Cobain had an admittedly high level of tolerance for heroine, and was therefore, quite capable of pulling the trigger that ended his life. Love has, and still does, maintain her innocence, and in this instance, the authors don't actually accuse her of murder, but the inference is there for all to read.

The authors also insist that if she is not guilty, the killer is still out there, and that Love, "should get on the trail and find out who really killed her husband."

[HippieChild]

Wallace was quoted as saying, "We spent eight years looking for a smoking gun, and nothing proves Courtney Love killed Kurt Cobain. We searched, and we searched hard."

You need to read the book to understand the full impact of those words. They are saying they found no "smoking gun evidence" or in other words, evidence that directly links Courtney to Kurt's death. They searched hard for it but only came up with circumstantial evidence. However, here in America a person can be put on trial with only circumstantial evidence, provided there was enough circumstantial evidence to piece together a case. The evidence in the book, albeit "circumstantial" is pretty blatant and d-amning and more often than not, Courtney love is implicated. Read the book.

They also agreed that it is possible for prints to be smudged off a gun when it recoils on firing.

Absolutely possible, but Kurt was gripping the gun tightly, that itself being very unusual considering in most cases the gun would have flown out of his hands the moment after the blast. There were 4 latent prints lifted where Kurt had been gripping the gun, yet the rest of the gun was clean. Nothing. As if it had been wiped. There would have been some sort of residue left behind to prove human contact, but nothing. A quick back blast from the shotgun wiped the gun completely clean? I don't think so.

The three other medical examiners told "Dateline" that the information provided was found to be "inconclusive". Handwriting analysts that were showed the suicide note said the sample was inconclusive, and may have been similar to samples of Cobain's handwriting.

Inconclusive, not completely ruled out.

Halperin and Wallace's conclusions; claiming they interviewed five medical examiners, two of which said that Cobain had an admittedly high level of tolerance for heroine, and was therefore, quite capable of pulling the trigger that ended his life.

That's two out of five. Yet there still has never been another case similar to Kurt's, ever. Dr. Denise Marshall, a deputy coronor in the state of Colorado and a leading forensice medicolegan investigator conducted a very thorough investigation trying to obtain a case that had similar amounts of heroin involved and she came up with nothing. Nada. Zip. It's never been done, ever, except in Kurt's case.

Love has, and still does, maintain her innocence, and in this instance, the authors don't actually accuse her of murder, but the inference is there for all to read.

The authors also insist that if she is not guilty, the killer is still out there, and that Love, "should get on the trail and find out who really killed her husband."

Yeah, so I agree with them. If she's not guilty, there is sufficiant evidence out there that warrants the reopening of this case. If Kurt was murdered, doesn't she want to know who killed her husband and why? I sure as hell would.

[x]

bump

[dildohead]

bump